From “Mesearch” to “Wesearch”: The Role of Community in Developing Identity-Centric Research
Keywords:Collaborative autoethnography, Community, Doctoral education, Identity, Social group
The term “mesearch” has sometimes been used pejoratively to refer to topics of study of personal interest and importance to the individual conducting the research. This paper argues that a valuable research project can emerge from the inherently subjective but also recognizes that the views and experiences of one person are not necessarily representative of others of the same social identity, or community. Using a collaborative autoethnography approach, two researchers from different communities examine their own dissertation journeys, resulting in the conceptualization of three themes (e.g., community presence, social ideation, and group checking) useful in considering what role a person’s social group may serve in the development of identity-centric research. Beyond exploring these themes, the researchers apply the identity-centric perspective to the future of Library and Information Science education, asking what role social identity can serve in developing research that is valuable to community members and to academic literature alike.
ALISE. (2022). “Go back and get it: From one narrative to many.” Association For Library and Information Science Education. Retrieved from https://www.alise.org/2022-annual- conference
Ashley, F. (2021). Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics. Bioethics, 35(3), 270-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12829
Cann, C., & DeMeulenaere, E. (2020). The activist academic: Engaged scholarship for resistance, hope and social change. Gorham, Maine: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Candela, A. G. (2019). Exploring the function of member checking. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 619-628. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/exploring-function- member-checking/docview/2213787326/se-2
Chen, P. G., Diaz, N., Lucas, G., & Rosenthal, M. S. (2010). Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39(4), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.021
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
Colón-Aguirre, M., & Bright, K. (2022). Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) into Research. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 63(3).
Cooke, N. A., & Kitzie, V. L. (2021). Outsiders‐within‐Library and Information Science: Reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24449
Conradie, P. D., Herregodts, A. L., De Marez, L., & Saldien, J. (2016, December). Product ideation by persons with disabilities: An analysis of lead user characteristics. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion (pp. 69-76).
Cupid, S. (2020). “It Felt Like Home:” Exploring Practices and Mentoring Experiences among Black Doctoral Women and Black Faculty Women in Sister Circles at Mid-Atlantic Universities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore County).
Dym, B., Brubaker, J. R., Fiesler, C., & Semaan, B. (2019). “Coming Out Okay” Community Narratives for LGBTQ Identity Recovery Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359256
Douglas, T. R. (2017). My Reasonable Response: Activating Research, MeSearch, and WeSearch to Build Systems of Healing. Critical Education, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v8i2.186223
Eisner, E. (1992). Objectivity in educational research. Curriculum inquiry, 22(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1992.11075389
Gardner, S. K., Hart, J., Ng, J., Ropers-Huilman, R., Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2017). “Me- search”: Challenges and opportunities regarding subjectivity in knowledge construction. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 88- 108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00014
Gibson, A. N., Chancellor, R. L., Cooke, N. A., Dahlen, S. P., Patin, B., & Shorish, Y. L. (2020). Struggling to breathe: COVID-19, protest and the LIS response. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 40(1), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2020- 0178
Gray, L., & Mehra, B. (2021). Going Against the Current of Hegemonic “White-IST” Discourse: A Doctoral Program Journey from Critical Student+ Guide Perspectives. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(2), 182-200. DOI: 10.3138/jelis.2020-0056
Guzik, E. (2013). Representing Ourselves in Information Science Research: A Methodological Essay on Autoethnography/La représentation de nous-mêmes dans la recherche en sciences de l'information: Essai méthodologique sur l'auto-ethnographie. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 37(4), 267-283. 10.1353/ils.2013.0025
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual review of public health, 19(1), 173-202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
Kitzie, V. (2018). "I Pretended to be a Boy on the Internet": Navigating Affordances and Constraints of Social Networking Sites and Search Engines for LGBTQ+ Identity Work. First Monday, 23(7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i7.9264
Letherby, G., Scott, J., & Williams, M. (2012). Objectivity and subjectivity in social research. London: Sage.
Mehra, B., & Braquet, D. (2011). Progressive LGBTQ reference: coming out in the 21st century. Reference Services Review, 39(3), 401-422. DOI 10.1108/00907321111161403
Nash, R. J., & Bradley, D. L. (2011). Me-search and re-search: A guide for writing scholarly personal narrative manuscripts. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
Ortiz, K., Nash, J., Shea, L., Oetzel, J., Garoutte, J., Sanchez-Youngman, S., & Wallerstein, N. (2020). Partnerships, processes, and outcomes: A health equity–focused scoping meta- review of community-engaged scholarship. Annual Review of Public Health, 41, 177- 199. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094220
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., & Bertolini, D. (2020). Toward epistemic justice: An approach for conceptualizing epistemicide in the information professions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.242
Pionke, J. J. (2020). COVID-19, accessibility, and libraries: A call to action. College & Research Libraries News, 81(8), 398-399. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.81.8.398
Potnis, D.D. and Winberry, J. (2021), "Seven information practices for alleviating information vulnerability", Journal of Documentation, 78(4), 835-852.
Ratner, C. (2002, September). Subjectivity and objectivity in qualitative methodology. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 3, No. 3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.3.829
Rios, K., & Roth, Z. C. (2020). Is “me-search” necessarily less rigorous research? Social and personality psychologists’ stereotypes of the psychology of religion. Self and Identity, 19(7), 825-840. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1690035
Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.007
Song, H. (2018). “Sources of research ideas.” In Allen (ed.). The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Tatara, T. (Ed.). (1999). Understanding elder abuse in minority populations. Psychology Press: Hove, United Kingdom.
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: self‐ identity, social identity and group norms. British journal of social psychology, 38(3), 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149
Vera, A. N., Wagner, T. L., & Kitzie, V. L. (2020). “When it’s Time to Come Together, We Come Together”: Reconceptualizing Theories of Self-efficacy for Health Information Practices within LGBTQIA+ Communities. In Roles and Responsibilities of Libraries in Increasing Consumer Health Literacy and Reducing Health Disparities. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., ... & Whitener, L. (2004). Community‐based participatory research: Assessing the evidence: Summary. AHRQ evidence report summaries.
Winberry, J. (2021). Student perspectives of LIS education in an aging society: Initial findings. 2021 ALISE Conference, virtual. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/118793
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Winberry, LaVerne Gray
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.