Opposing Epistemicide as First Principle
Redeeming Social Epistemology in LIS Education
Keywords:epistemic injustice, epistemicide, social epistemology
Social epistemology is a theory of knowledge that recognizes the social dimension of knowledge creation. In the LIS context it also serves as an enduring theory of how and why LIS professionals organize collective knowledge of the world. There is a growing awareness among LIS researchers that epistemic and cognitive injustices, and systematic attempts at epistemicide are widespread. Any theory of social epistemology that is meant to guide LIS practice must take into account the moral dimension of harms caused by allowing epistemic injustices to proliferate in information systems. Pivoting to the idea that opposing epistemicide and other injustices is central to the purpose of the LIS profession warrants a reconsideration of how educators discuss the core values in foundations courses.
Budd, J. M. (2002). Jessa Shera, Sociologist of Knowledge? The Library Quarterly, 72(4), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/40039791
Budd, J. M. (2004). Academic Libraries and Knowledge: A Social Epistemology Framework. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), 361–367.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide (1 edition). Routledge.
Egan, M. E., & Shera, J. H. (1952). Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography. The Library Quarterly, 22(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/4304106
Fallis, D. (2006). Social epistemology and information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40(1), 475–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440400119
Fricker, M. (2013). Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? Synthese, 190(7), 1317–1332.
Hoppers, C. A. O. (2007). Knowledge, democracy, and justice in a globalizing world. Nordic Studies in Education, 27(1), 38–53.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition (4 edition). University of Chicago Press.
Oliphant, T. (2021). Emerging (information) realities and epistemic injustice. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 951–962.
Patin, B., Oliphant, T., Allard, D., Gray, L., Clarke, R. I., Tacheva, J., & Lar-Son, K. (2021). At the Margins of Epistemology: Amplifying Alternative Ways of Knowing in Library and Information Science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 630–633.
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., & Bertolini, D. (2020). Toward epistemic justice: An approach for conceptualizing epistemicide in the information professions. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e242.
Patin, B., Sebastian, M., Yeon, J., Bertolini, D., & Grimm, A. (2021). Interrupting epistemicide: A practical framework for naming, identifying, and ending epistemic injustice in the information professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1306–1318.
Shera, J. H. (1972). The foundations of education for librarianship. Becker and Hayes.
Shera, J. H. (1973). Toward a theory of librarianship and information science. Ciência Da Informaccão, 2(2). http://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/index.php/ciinf/article/viewArticle/1643
Visvanathan, S. (2009). The search for cognitive justice. Knowledge in Question: A Symposium on Interrogating Knowledge and Questioning Science, Seminar, 597.
Copyright (c) 2022 John Burgess, Gina Fowler
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.