Community Dialogues to Enhance Inclusion and Equity in Public Libraries

Authors

  • Anne Holland Space Science Institute
  • Jen Jocz Education Development Center
  • Stephanie Vierow-Fields Space Science Institute
  • Dr. Zachary Stier Erickson Public Library
  • Lindsay Gypin University of Denver

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21900/j.jloe.v1i2.856

Keywords:

public library, community, equity, conversation, inclusion

Abstract

Over the past decade, public libraries have shifted from quiet repositories of knowledge to raucous centers of public engagement. Public libraries seek to fill the educational and social gaps left by other informal education organizations (such as museums and science centers) that target specific populations or require paid access for their resources. These gaps are filled by hiring social workers, providing accessible makerspaces, developing English language learner (ELL) programs, facilitating hands-on STEM activities, providing information about community resources and social services, providing summer meals, and much more. But what are the next steps to continue this high level of engagement? By utilizing a Community Dialogue Framework (Dialogues), libraries have engaged with new members of their communities to reach groups not currently benefiting from library services, provided equitable access to new resources, engaged with new partners, and - in the time of COVID - began to address the digital divide in their communities. An examination of forty public libraries’ engagement with and learning from Dialogues was conducted using a qualitative approach and reflexive thematic analysis. An account from a librarian who hosted multiple Dialogues is also presented as a first-person narrative describing their methods and successes using the tool. Benefits and practical considerations for conducting Dialogues are discussed in the results section, followed by limitations and recommendations for further research in this area.

References

Africawala, Jasmine. 2015. “Coffee & Conversation.” Programming Librarian. https://programminglibrarian.org/programs/coffee-conversation.

American Library Association. 2015. “Libraries Transforming Communities.” Tools, Publications & Resources. 2015. http://www.ala.org/tools/librariestransform/libraries-transforming-communities.

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2019. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11(4): 589–97.

Brown, Chris. 2015. “Conversation-Based Librarianship: A New Potential for Community Knowledge.” Journal of Library Administration 55(6): 483–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1054768.

Damasco, Ione T. 2019. “Creating Meaningful Engagement in Academic Libraries Using Principles of Intergroup Dialogue.” in Libraries Promoting Reflective Dialogue in a Time of Political Polarization; edited by Andrea Baer, Elyysa Stern Cahoy, Robert, Schroeder; 13–32. Chicago, Illinois: Association of College and Research Libraries

Everett, Stephanie. 2018. “Visualizing the Silent Dialogue about Race: Diversity Outreach in an Academic Library.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(4) : 518–52

Everhart, Kevin, and Abraham Wandersman. 2000. “Applying Comprehensive Quality Programming and Empowerment Evaluationto Reduce Implementation Barriers.” Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 11(2): 177–91.

Fetterman, David M. 1994. “Empowerment Evaluation.” Evaluation Practice 15(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0886-1633(94)90055-8.

Fetterman, David M., Liliana Rodríguez-Campos, Ann P. Zukoski, and Contributors. 2017. Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches. Guilford Publications.2017.

Fetterman, David M., and Abraham Wandersman. 2005. Empowerment Evaluation Principles in Practice. Guilford Press.

Fitzhugh, Ginger, Jocz, Jen, Liston, Carrie. 2021. “NASA @ My Library Summative Report.”ncil.spacescience.org/papers

Holland, Anne. 2016. “Front-End Evaluation: Report from the Discover Health/Descubre La Salud Community Dialogues.” http://ncil.spacescience.org/images/papers/DH%20Community%20Dialogues%20Report.pdf.

Holland, Anne. 2018. “A Community Dialogue Guide for Public Libraries.” May, 2018. http://www.starnetlibraries.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Community-Dialogue-Guide100418.pdf

Holland, Anne, and Dusenbery, Paul. 2018. “Community Dialogues in Informal Science Institutions.” Informal Learning Review, no. 152: 21–24.

Honisett, Amy., Short, Rachel, and Schwab, Kate. 2018. “Building Community at the Library with Coffee and Conversation.” OLA Quarterly 23(4): 20–25.

Jocz, Jen, Greller, Sarah. 2020. “Project BUILD Summative Evaluation Report.” https://www.informalscience.org/project-build-summativeevaluation-report

Johnson, Sarah. “Partnering for Social Justice.” In Social Justice and Activism in Libraries: Essays on Diversity and Change. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc, Publishers. 2019.

Johnston, Jamie. 2016. “Conversation-Based Programming and Newcomer Integration: A Case Study of the Språkhörnan Program at Malmö City Library.” Library & Information Science Research 38(1): 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.02.001.

Johnston, Jamie, and Ragnar Audunson. 2019. “Supporting Immigrants’ Political Integration through Discussion and Debate in Public Libraries.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51(1): 228–242.

Kemmis, Stephen, Robin McTaggart, and Rhonda Nixon. 2014. “Introducing Critical Participatory Action Research.” In The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research, edited by Stephen Kemmis, Robin McTaggart, and Rhonda Nixon, 1–31. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2_1.

Lankes, David. “Beyond the Bullet Points: Bad Libraries Build Collections, Good Libraries Build Services, Great Libraries Build Communities.” n.d. Accessed March 25, 2021. https://davidlankes.org/beyond-the-bulletpoints-bad-libraries-build-collections-good-libraries-build-services-greatlibraries-build-communities/.

Lewin, Kurt. 1946. “Action Research and Minority Problems.” Journal of Social Issues 2, no. 4: 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.

Lor, Peter Johan. 2018. “Democracy, Information, and Libraries in a Time of Post-Truth Discourse.” Library Management 39(5): 307–21.

Merriam, Sharan, and Tisdell, Elizabeth. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Museum of Science. 2021. “Coronavirus, a Community Conversation.” https://www.mos.org/mos-at-home/town-hall/communityconversation-coronavirus

Patton, Michael Quinn. 1997. Utilization-focused Evaluation: The New Century Text (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Pew. 2013. “Library Services in the Digital Age.” https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/01/22/library-services/

Real, Brian, John Carlo Bertot, and Paul T. Jaeger. 2014. “Rural Public Libraries and Digital Inclusion: Issues and Challenges.” Information Technology and Libraries (Online); Chicago 33, 1: 6–24.

Shtivelband, Annette, Wallander-Roberts, Amanda, and Jakubowski, Robert 2016. “STEM Equity Report, Datum Advisors, Research Evaluation Consulting.” http://ncil.spacescience.org/images/papers/STEM-Equity-Informal-Learning-Settings-122316.pdf

Secret, Mary, Audrey Jordan, and Janet Ford. 1999. “Empowerment Evaluation as a Social Work Strategy.” Health & Social Work 24 (2): 120–27.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. 1994. “Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go.” Evaluation Practice 15(3): 321–38.

Thorpe, Kirsten, and Monica Galassi. 2018. “Diversity, Inclusion & Respect: Embedding Indigenous Priorities in Public Library Services.” Public Library Quarterly 37(2): 180–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1460568.

Usherwood, Bob. 2016. Equity and Excellence in the Public Library: Why Ignorance Is Not Our Heritage. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, Ashgate, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315580173.

Whiteman, Eliza D., Roxanne Dupuis, Anna U. Morgan, Bernadette D’Alonzo, Caleb Epstein, Heather Klusaritz, and Carolyn C. Cannuscio. 2018. “Public Libraries As Partners for Health.” Preventing Chronic Disease 15. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170392.

Williams, Amber, Erica Freudenberger, and Cindy Fesemyer. 2019. “Food for Thought: Feeding Mind and Body at Public Libraries.” In Social Justice and Activism in Libraries: Essays on Diversity and Change. (pg. 39). Edited by Sue Epstein, Carol Smallwood, and Vera Gubnitskaia. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc, Publishers. 2019.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-13