Mediating the Tech Boom Temporalities of Displacement and Resistance

Main Article Content

Erin McElroy

Abstract

Since the 2011 emergence of the San Francisco Bay Area “Tech Boom 2.0,” anti-eviction activists of the region have been caught amidst a maelstrom of media wars involving an amalgam of real estate and technology speculative analyses. As tensions grow, the media itself becomes increasingly polarized, as some journals and journalists side with simplified renditions of tech being good or bad, of development being right or wrong, of housing justice activists being outmoded or salvific.


This article attends to this media polarization, studying likely and unlikely alliances between journalists, media sources, and advocates of various urban futurities. At the same time, it looks to alternative media arts and hybrid technologies that have arisen precisely to theorize contemporary realities of the region, from critical cartography digital projects to projection art productions. In doing so, I ask, how have innovative media arts projects such as that of the Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, People Power Media, and the Saito Group arisen out of both a media dearth and surplus, not only furthering community knowledge production but also shattering dialectical narratives clung to by other media sources? Furthermore, I question, how are entanglements and polarizations across varying media production constituted by, and constitutive of, formations of class, race, and gender? Drawing on cultural and media analysis, feminist technology studies, and critical race and ethnicity studies, this paper situates the technological media crisis and eruption of the Bay Area present alongside the spatial materialization of technological growth, looking at how technologically driven geographic mutation both mediates and is mediated by emergent media technologies.

Article Details

Section
Essays

References

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, “Tech Bus Evictions,” June, 2015, accessed September 10, 2016. http://www.antievictionmappingproject.net/techbusevictions.html.

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, “Triple Tech Bus Blockade,” IndyBay, February 9, 2015. Accessed September 12, 2016. https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2015/02/09/18768311.php.

Audra Simpson, “Consent’s Revenge,” Cultural Anthropology, 31, no. 3 (2016): 328.

Audra Simpson, “On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship,” Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, 9, no. 1 (2007): 68.

Audra Simpson, Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States (Durham: Duke University Press, 2014), 13.

C. W. Nevius, “SF Rent Wars: When the Tenant is the Bully,” San Francisco Chronicle, October 21, 2015. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/nevius/article/S-F-rent-wars-When-the-tenant-is-the-bully-6582895.php.

Clyde Woods, “Life After Death.” The Professional Geographer, 54 (2002): 62-66.

Danielle Day and David Weinzimmer, “Riding First Class: Impacts of Silicon Valley Shuttles on Commute & Residential Location Choice.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley (2014): 1-20. http://www.danielledai.com/academic/dai-weinzimmer-shuttles.pdf.

David Scott, Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment (Durham, Duke University Press, 2004); David Scott, Omens of Adversity: Tragedy, Time, Memory, Justice. (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014).

Donald McNeill, “Governing a City of Unicorns: Technology Capital and The Urban Politics of San Francisco.” Urban Geography 37, no. 4 (2016): 494-513.

Douglas Kellner, Media Spectacle and the Crisis of Democracy: Terrorism, War, and Election Battles (New York: Routledge, 2015).

Elizabeth Povinelli, The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Multiculturalism (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002), 6.

Erin McElroy, “Intersectional Contours of Loss and Resistance,” Antipode, Interventions, August, 2016. Accessed September 12, 2016. https://antipodefoundation.org/2016/08/18/intersectional-contours-of-loss-and-resistance/.

Erin McElroy, “San Francisco Tech Bus Stops, Displacement, and Architectures of Racial Capitalism.” Arcade 34, no. 2 (2016): 26.

Erin McElroy. “Postsocialism and the Tech Boom 2.0: Techno-utopics of Racial/spatial Dispossession.” Social Identities, special issue edited by Neda Atanasoski and Kalindi Vora (forthcoming).

Fred Moten, “The Case of Blackness,” Criticism, 50, no. 2 (2008): 177-218.

Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle, trans. by Donald Nicholson-Smith (New York: Zone Books, 1994).

Hayden White, “Interpretation in History,” New Literary History 4, no. 2 (1973). Donna Haraway, Modest_Witness@Second_Millenim.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse (New York York: Routledege, 1997), 151.

Jim Edwards, “Meet the Woman at the Heart of San Francisco’s Anti-Tech Gentrification Protests,” Business Insider, May 25, 2014. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://www.businessinsider.com/erin-mcelroy-and-san-francisco-anti-tech-gentrification-protests-2014-5.

Julie Uldam, “Corporate Management of Visibility and the Fantasy of the Post-Political: Social Media and Surveillance,” New Media & Society, 18, no. 2 (2016): 201-219.

Karen Barad. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs 28, no 3 (2003): 924, 804.

Kevin Fox Gotham, “Marketing Mardi Gras: Commodification, spectacle and the political economy of tourism in New Orleans.” Urban Studies 39.10 (2002): 1735-1756.

Kim Tallbear. “Standing with and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-Indigenous Approach to Inquiry.” Journal of Research Practice 10, no. 2 (2014): 17.

Kristen Brown, “Is the Anti-Tech Movement Obsolete?” SF Gate, February 10, 2015. Accessed September 10, 2016. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Is-the-antitech-movement-obsolete-6067623.php.

Laura Kurgan, Close Up at a Distance: Mapping, Technology, and Politics. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013).

Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White, “Introduction-Race and Digital Technology: Code, the Color Line, and the Information Society.” In Race After the Internet, edited by Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White, (New York: Routledge, 2012: 1).

Manissa Maharawal and Erin McElroy, “The Anti-Eviction Mapping Project: Counter Mapping and Oral History towards Bay Area Housing Justice.” Annals of American Geography, forthcoming; Catherine Ignazio, “What Would Feminist Data Visualization Look Like?” MIT Blog. 2015, accessed February 10, 2017. https://civic.mit.edu/feminist-data-visualization; Denis Wood and John Krygier, “Critical Cartography.” The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (New York and London: Elsevier, 2009).

Manissa Maharawal, “San Francisco’s Tech-led Gentrification: Public Space, Protest, and the Urban Commons.” In Jeff Hou and Sabine Knierbein (eds). City Unsilenced: Urban Resistance and Public Space in the age of Shrinking Democracy. (London: Routledge, 2017).

McElroy, “Intersectional Contours of Loss and Resistance: Mapping Bay Area Gentrification.”

Michael Frisch, “Review: Oral History and ‘Hard Times,’ a Review Essay: Hard Times by Studs Terkel.” The Oral History Review 7, (1979): 70-79

Nancy Mirabal, Geographies of Displacement: Latina/os, Oral History, and The Politics of Gentrification in San Francisco’s Mission District, The Public Historian 31, no. 2 (2009): 11.

Nathan Heller, “California Screaming” The New Yorker, July 7, 2014. Accessed September 10, 2016, http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/07/07/california-screaming.

Nellie Bowles, “Coffee with an Anarchist: Memes and Motives Behind Blocking Google Buses,” Re/Code, April 22, 2014. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://www.recode.net/2014/4/22/11625908/coffee-with-an-anarchist-memes-and-motives-behind-blocking-google.

Oscar Wilde, The Decay of Lyiny, (London, Haldeman-Julius Company, 1986), 1071-92.

POOR Magazine’s official Web Site, “About Us,” August, 2016, accessed September 10, 2016. http://www.poormagazine.org/About%20Us.

Popovici, “The Carnival, the Spectacle, and the Non-Event,” 6.

Povinelli, The Cunning of Recognition, 6.

Rachel Swan, “The Evolution of Protest: The Bay Area Has Been Shaped by Dissent, But No One Can Stand in the Way of What’s Coming,” SF Weekly, February 19. Accessed September 12, 2016. http://archives.sfweekly.com/sanfrancisco/the-evolution-of-protest-the-bay-area-has-been-shaped-by-dissent-but-no-one-can-stand-in-the-way-of-whats-coming/.

Saito Group’s official Web Site, “Eviction Protection Representation,” August 2016. accessed September 10, 2016. http://www.saitogroup.info/eviction-protection-representation/.

Scott, Omens of Adversity, 64.

Simpson, “On Ethnographic Refusal,” 68.

Tallbear, “Standing with and Speaking as Faith: A Feminist-Indigenous Approach to Inquiry.”

Tom Boellstorf, “For Whom the Ontology Turns: Theorizing the Digital Real.” Current Anthropology 57, no. 4 (2016): 397.

Veda Popovici, “The Carnival, the Spectacle, and the Non-Event: A Three-Step Strategy of Making Us Harmless.” Benza 2 (March 2012): 6.

Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, “Race and/as Technology or How to Do Things to Race.” In Race After the Internet, edited by Lisa Nakamura and Peter A. Chow-White, (New York: Routledge, 2012: 39-59).