Gentlemen Prefer Blondes: A Critical EditionMain MenuPrefaceEditor's IntroductionRead about the conceptualization of the edition and its significance for scholars, students, and casual readers.The Text and Illustrations of Gentlemen Prefer BlondesRead the novel or examine the variants in text and visual presentation between the two original published editions.Critical and Biographical ContextRead about the production and reception of Blondes, explore maps of locations in the text, read about historical references, and read biographies of writer Anita Loos and illustrator Ralph Barton.Production of the EditionInformation about technical production and about contributors to the edition.About This BookAnita Loosdf7e8181b9011d96a772f9bc7265339b41c1e804Edited by Daniel G. Tracy1084a62f79367058cb758225ddf0a8810cfba170
Reviews of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes
12022-02-18T10:20:45+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a1227plain2023-06-16T11:24:14+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aWhile literary critics have noted a few reviews, there were more that have gone unexplored, including many not listed in typical book review indexes. The below timeline shows all known contemporary book reviews of Blondes, with copies of the original documents and a brief gloss. You can go to a review to see the document image on its own by clicking on the title in the timeline or in the full list of reviews after the timeline. You can read a transcription of the review by clicking on the transcription link at the end of the review summary text in the timeline.
This page has paths:
12021-02-05T13:30:27+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aCritical and Biographical ContextDaniel G. Tracy7Read about the production and reception of Blondes, explore maps of locations in the text, read about historical references, and read biographies of writer Anita Loos and illustrator Ralph Barton.plain2024-03-23T00:53:57+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
Contents of this tag:
12022-02-18T10:16:02+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aSaint Louis Post-Dispatch, November 14, 19254The first review of GPB appears to have been this blurb emphasizing Loos's ties to Hollywood. It also inaugurates what essentially became part of the GPB meme in popular culture, questioning the veracity of the title's assertion. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251114_StLouisDispatch.pdfplain2023-06-16T11:17:27+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, http://www.proquest.com/docview/1874392513/52B066FE1E0040AEPQ/228?accountid=1455311/14/1925UnknownNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:38:45+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aChicago Daily Tribune, December 20, 19254Frederick Donaghey's review of GPB appeared in this this theater column because of the early news that the book would be adapted to the stage. While he loved the novel's humor, he cast doubt on its suitability as a stage show, presaging the critical fate of the initial theatrical production. He also questions the quality of Barton's illustrations, an unusual stance among the critics. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251220_ChicagoDailyTribune.pdfplain2023-06-16T11:58:36+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/this-thing-that-theater/docview/180753457/se-2?accountid=1455312/20/1925Frederick DonagheyNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:53:22+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aSpringfield Daily Republican, December 27, 19253This review is the first to mention the production history of GPB. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251227_SpringfieldRepublican.pdfplain2023-06-16T12:07:14+00:0012/27/1925UnknownPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:56:11+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aThe Literary Digest, February, 19263Thomas Masson's brief treatment of GPB in this discussion of recent humor titles treats it as fun but ultimately not original in approach, similar in assessment to the other titles he reviews. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260200_LiteraryDigest.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:10:48+00:00HathiTrust, https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015029757112?urlappend=%3Bseq=197%3Bownerid=13510798896788681-2012/1926Thomas L. MassonPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:00:34+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aTime, February 22, 19263In a review titled "Moronese," the reviewer appreciates Loos's stylistic approach: "The literature of illiteracy is enriched." Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260222_Time.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:14:43+00:002/22/1926UnknownPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:32:40+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aLife, December 10, 19253A brief glowing review, praising the humor of GPB. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251210_Life.pdfplain2023-06-16T10:49:39+00:0012/10/1925Baird LeonardPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:04:27+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aLife, April 8, 19263A "rhymed review" that rehearses the plot of GPB and praises Loos as a writer. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260408_Life.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:24:20+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/magazines/rhymed-reviews/docview/90836143/se-2?accountid=145534/8/1926Arthur GuitermanNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:09:34+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aThe Observer, May 2, 19263This British review by Rose Macaulay declares GPB "the funniest book that has appeared in either England or America" since a 1919 title. Macauley highlights the satirical look at Lorelei's "idiom of naïve and intriguing imbecility." Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260502a_Observer.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:30:54+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/at-random/docview/481034419/se-2?accountid=145535/2/1926Rose MacaulayNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:25:17+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aThe Literary Review of the Saturday Evening Post, November 21, 19253William Kerr penned the first signed review of GPB, highlighting it as a novel about "a high-powered gold digger and her butter and egg man." He ties Loos's success as a movie scenario writer to her success writing diary entries. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251121_LiteraryReview.pdfplain2023-06-16T11:31:26+00:0011/21/1925William C. KerrPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:13:00+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aChicago Daily Tribune, May 7, 19263This anonymous editorial review of GPB is the most blatant criticism of the novel, lamenting its portrayal of sex as a lapse in morality. The commentary is more direct about Lorelei's escapades than other writers, referring to it as "the story of two young prostitutes." The review complains, "It lacks even the stereotyped subterfuges with which the usual sex appeal literature covers up its pornographics." This judgement led to a reader response seen in the next review. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260507_ChicagoDailyTribune.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:35:38+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/docview/180813796/pageviewPDF/2EF5D990BA054961PQ/1?accountid=145535/7/1926UnknownNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:16:46+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aChicago Daily Tribune, May 16, 19263In this reader response to the moralistic condemnation of Blondes in a prior editorial in the same newspaper, the writer defends GPB by pointing to its satirical elements and its condemnation of a culture where prostitution has become a general state of affairs: "The condition she has so unaffectedly caught is by no means confined to prostitutes--or even to semi-prostitutes. It is a widespread attitude of mind--a sign of the times, as your writers truly says, but a sign of the commercialized times, as he carefully does not say." Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260516_ChicagoDailyTribune.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:38:51+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/voice-people/docview/180719038/se-2?accountid=145535/16/1926Frederic HayesNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T11:19:11+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aThe American Mercury, September 19263George Jean Nathan's glowing review of the novel leads to a more muted endorsement of the play adaptation of the GPB. He praises Loos in connection with Ring Lardner, claiming they both rise above others who write jokes that they then put into characters mouths and instead focus on the characters first, letting the jokes come naturally. "On the surface we have simply a burlesque show, but in the cellar under the stage, hidden from view, we have some cunning analysis of character that serves as the burlesque show's stoutest prop." Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19260900_AmericanMercury.pdfplain2023-06-16T13:43:44+00:00HathiTrust, https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015030743747?urlappend=%3Bseq=660%3Bownerid=13510798883066927-6049/1926George Jean NathanPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:43:22+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aNew York Times, December 27, 19253GPB gets the lion's share of space in this composite review of six new humor novels, with reviewer Herman J. Mankiewicz hinting at its fast best seller status when he notes some readers might go ahead and buy one other other titles if the bookstore ran out of Loos's book. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251227_NewYorkTimes.pdfplain2023-06-16T11:56:16+00:00HathiTrust, https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31210018778645?urlappend=%3Bseq=803%3Bownerid=116485069-84712/27/1925Herman J. MankiewiczPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:47:47+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aNew York Herald, New York Tribune, December 27, 19253Ruth Goodman's review, while positive, offers some rare critical glances at the book, suggesting it needed more satirical edge and that some of the jokes failed. She also devotes greater attention to Barton than other reviewers, spending a paragraph praising his illustrations and proceding to wonder why he hasn't yet published his own book. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251227_NewYorkTribune.pdfplain2023-06-16T12:03:43+00:00ProQuest Historical Newspapers, https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/cabochon-emeralds/docview/1112951797/se-2?accountid=1455312/27/1925Ruth GoodmanNo Copyright, Contractual RestrictionsDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a
12022-02-18T10:29:15+00:00Daniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12aThe Boston Transcript, November 25, 19252This review is the first to highlight Lorelei's inability to spell and other cultural gaps, contrasting it with her brilliance in conning men. Read transcription.media/GPBReview_19251125_BostonTranscript.pdfplain2023-06-16T11:37:47+00:0011/25/1925UnknownPublic DomainDaniel G. Tracye4d2055c1ec04bf92575642aae6698bc52f8f12a