This site requires Javascript to be turned on. Please enable Javascript and reload the page.

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes: A Critical Edition

Chicago Daily Tribune, May 7, 1926

This anonymous editorial review of GPB is the most blatant criticism of the novel, lamenting its portrayal of sex as a lapse in morality. The commentary is more direct about Lorelei's escapades than other writers, referring to it as "the story of two young prostitutes." The review complains, "It lacks even the stereotyped subterfuges with which the usual sex appeal literature covers up its pornographics." This judgement led to a reader response seen in the next review. Read transcription.

This page has tags:

Contents of this tag:
1. Chicago Daily Tribune, December 20, 1925 Frederick Donaghey's review of GPB appeared in this this theater column because of the early news that the book would be adapted to the stage. While he loved the novel's humor, he cast doubt on its suitability as a stage show, presaging the critical fate of the initial theatrical production. He also questions the quality of Barton's illustrations, an unusual stance among the critics. Read transcription.
2. Saint Louis Post-Dispatch, November 14, 1925
3. The Observer, May 2, 1926
4. The Literary Review of the Saturday Evening Post, November 21, 1925
5. Chicago Daily Tribune, May 7, 1926 This anonymous editorial review of GPB is the most blatant criticism of the novel, lamenting its portrayal of sex as a lapse in morality. The commentary is more direct about Lorelei's escapades than other writers, referring to it as "the story of two young prostitutes." The review complains, "It lacks even the stereotyped subterfuges with which the usual sex appeal literature covers up its pornographics." This judgement led to a reader response seen in the next review. Read transcription.
6. Chicago Daily Tribune, May 16, 1926 In this reader response to the moralistic condemnation of Blondes in a prior editorial in the same newspaper, the writer defends GPB by pointing to its satirical elements and its condemnation of a culture where prostitution has become a general state of affairs: "The condition she has so unaffectedly caught is by no means confined to prostitutes--or even to semi-prostitutes. It is a widespread attitude of mind--a sign of the times, as your writers truly says, but a sign of the commercialized times, as he carefully does not say." Read transcription.
7. The American Mercury, September 1926 George Jean Nathan's glowing review of the novel leads to a more muted endorsement of the play adaptation of the GPB. He praises Loos in connection with Ring Lardner, claiming they both rise above others who write jokes that they then put into characters mouths and instead focus on the characters first, letting the jokes come naturally. "On the surface we have simply a burlesque show, but in the cellar under the stage, hidden from view, we have some cunning analysis of character that serves as the burlesque show's stoutest prop." Read transcription.
8. New York Times, December 27, 1925
9. New York Herald, New York Tribune, December 27, 1925
11. The Literary Digest, February, 1926
14. Life, April 8, 1926
Contents of this tag:
1. Chicago Daily Tribune, May 7, 1926 This anonymous editorial review of GPB is the most blatant criticism of the novel, lamenting its portrayal of sex as a lapse in morality. The commentary is more direct about Lorelei's escapades than other writers, referring to it as "the story of two young prostitutes." The review complains, "It lacks even the stereotyped subterfuges with which the usual sex appeal literature covers up its pornographics." This judgement led to a reader response seen in the next review. Read transcription.