Are Library and Information Science Educators Teaching Accessibility?
Content Analysis of Syllabi
Keywords:accessibility, disability, diversity, equity, and inclusion
Library and information science (LIS) graduates are expected to serve patrons from diverse backgrounds, including disabled patrons. While serving patrons with disabilities is a core value of librarianship, graduates often feel unprepared to serve disabled patrons, suggesting that programs inadequately train students to design accessible services. This study’s authors analyzed hundreds of course descriptions and 73 syllabi from 20 North American LIS programs to determine how often accessibility and disability topics are covered and how educators teach accessibility. Findings indicate that accessibility and disability topics are mostly covered in electives, meaning students may never develop accessibility competencies during their programs. Additionally, a lack of disability-focused assessments may create the impression that serving disabled patrons is less important to LIS than addressing the needs of other underserved communities. Recommendations for educators include creating or revising learning objectives and assessments to prioritize accessibility education and support disabled patrons.
Alajmi, B., & Alshammari, I. (2020). Strands of diversity in library and information science graduate curricula. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 25(1), 103–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol25no1.6
American Library Association. (2019). Core values of librarianship. Advocacy, Legislation & Issues. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/corevalues.
Association for Library and Information Science Education. (2022). ALISE Leadership Academy. https://web.archive.org/web/20221007224602/https://www.alise.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1668:2022-leadership-academy&catid=21:alise-conferences.
Brinkley, J. (2020). Participation at what cost? Teaching accessibility using participatory design: An experience report. ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 114–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366931
Copeland, C. A. (2019a). Everyone, everywhere, every time. Journal of New Librarianship, 4 (Special Issue), 380–386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21173/newlibs/7/10
Copeland, C.A. (2019b). Accessing ability through Universal Design for Learning: The challenge, the opportunity, the responsibility [Webinar]. Association for Library and Information Science Education. https://www.alise.org/alise-webinars/.
Copeland, C. A., Cross, B., & Thompson, K. (2020). Universal Design creates equity and inclusion: Moving from theory to practice. South Carolina Libraries, 4(1), 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51221/sc.scl.2020.4.1.7
Copeland, C. A., & Mallary, K. J. (2021, February 19). Crafting accessible learning environments through Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning [Webinar]. The University of Denver.
Coverdale, A., Lewthwaite, S., & Horton, S. (2022). Teaching accessibility as a shared endeavor: Building capacity across academic and workplace contexts. Proceedings of the International Web for All Conference. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3493612.3520451
Dow, M., & Bushman, B. (2020). Neurodiversity in higher education: Library and information science educators address the learning needs of students with intellectual disabilities. Proceedings of the Association of Library and Information Science Education, 97–109. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/108801.
Eberly Center. (2023). Why should assessments, learning objectives, and instructional strategies be aligned? Carnegie Mellon University. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/alignment.html.
Gibson, A., Bowen, K., & Hanson, D. (2021). We need to talk about how we talk about disability: A critical quasi-systematic review. In the Library with the Lead Pipe. https://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2021/disability/.
Guedes, L., & Landoni, M. (2020). How are we teaching and dealing with accessibility? A survey from Switzerland. Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Information Exclusion, 141–146.
Horton, S., Lewthwaite, S., & Coverdale, A. (2021). Motivating learners with accessibility professionalism: A teaching accessibility quick start guide. The University of Southampton.
Jia, L., Elglaly, Y., Baker, C., & Shinohara, K. (2021). Infusing accessibility into programming courses. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451625
Maestro, R., Ramos-Eclevia, M., Eclevia, C., & Fredeluces, J. (2018). Teaching diversity, becoming inclusive: Perspectives and possibilities in ASEAN library and information science schools. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 67(2), 96–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2018.1467142
Mallary, K. J., & Copeland, C. A. (2020, August 24). Universal Design and Universal Design for Learning: Tools in equity of access [Webinar]. Association for Library and Information Science Education. https://www.alise.org/alise-webinars/.
Mulliken, A. (2016). Technology, diversity, Web accessibility, and ALA accreditation standards in MLIS. International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 1(1), 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v1i1.32184
Pionke, J. J. (2021). A secondary analysis of the library profession’s self-reported competence and comfort in working with patrons with disabilities. Library Management, 42(6–7), 409–420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-10-2020-0153
Poole, A. H. (2021). Promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in library and information science through community-based learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12645 LNCS, 529–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71292-1_41
Potnis, D., & Mallary, K. (2021). Analyzing service divide in academic libraries for better serving disabled patrons using assistive technologies. College & Research Libraries, 82(6), 879–898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.6.879
Putnam, C., Dahman, M., Rose, E., Cheng, J., & Bradford, G. (2016). Best practices for teaching accessibility in university classrooms: Cultivating awareness, understanding, and appreciation for diverse users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2831424
Ren, X., Alemanne, N., & Colson, L. (2022). How MLIS programs prepare students to serve diverse populations: The North American context. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 63(3), 301–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-2021-0021
Shinohara, K., Kawas, S., Ko, A., & Ladner, R. (2018). Who teaches accessibility? A survey of U.S. computing faculty. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 197–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159484
Thompson, K. M., & Copeland, C.A. (2021). Making the diversity, equity, and inclusion mindset indispensable in the LIS classroom through design, content, communication, and assessment. In K. Dali & N. Caidi (Eds.). Humanizing LIS education and practice: Diversity by design. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429356209-5
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Kevin J. Mallary, Dr. Rea N. Simons, Dr. Clayton A. Copeland, Jackie Nikiema, Evan J. Dorman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.