Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Canadian Approaches to Copyright Policy in the Age of AI

Authors

  • Lisa Di Valentino University of Massachusetts Amherst

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2024.1651

Keywords:

comparative legal analysis, fair dealing, fair use, United States, Canada

Abstract

As the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in everyday life (and particularly in education) increases in what seems to be an exponential way, lawmakers are racing to catch up with policy implications. This poster will present the results of an analysis of cases, legislation, and literature (widely defined) related to copyright concerns involved in the creation and use of AI. The review will take the form of a comparative analysis of approaches of the United States and Canada in crafting policy to address the incorporation of copyrighted materials in training generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney and the use of such output in various settings such as education. The analysis will consider existing copyright laws (including user rights such as fair use/dealing and educational uses), and proposed changes to the current laws.

References

AI firms must play fair when they use academic data in training [editorial]. (2024). Nature, 632(8027), 953–953. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02757-z

Charlesworth, J. (2024). Generative AI’s illusory case for fair use (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4924997). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4924997

Chat GPT Is Eating the World. (n.d.). Chat GPT Is Eating the World. Retrieved September 10, 2024, from https://chatgptiseatingtheworld.com/

Di Valentino, L. (2016). Laying the foundation for copyright policy and practice in Canadian universities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Ontario]. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4312

IP Scholars. (2021, September 26). Consultation on a modern copyright framework for artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/strategic-policy-sector/en/marketplace-framework-policy/copyright-policy/submissions-consultation-modern-copyright-framework-artificial-intelligence-and-internet-things/ip-scholars

Macklem, L. (2024). Another balancing act: Is artificial intelligence a creative catastrophe or an artistic asset? (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4923717). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4923717

Sag, M. (2023). Copyright safety for generative AI. Hous. L. Rev., 61, 295.

Sag, M. (2023). Fairness and fair use in generative AI. Joint PIJIP/TLS Research Paper Series. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/research/118

Torrance, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2023). Training is everything: Artificial intelligence, copyright, and “fair training.” Dickinson Law Review, 128(1), 233. https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlr/vol128/iss1/6

Downloads

Published

2024-10-16

Issue

Section

Works in Progress Posters