Skill-Building in Subject Representation: Assessing Learning Outcomes through Analysis of Student-Created Metadata
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2024.1665Keywords:
Subject access, subject representation, STEM materials, practical competencies assessment, metadata evaluationAbstract
Representation of topics, places, events and other entities that information resource is about (referred to as subject representation) is crucial in facilitating access to information. It is an integral part of one of the core competencies of information professionals defined by the American Library Association (ALA). Students in ALA-accredited professional degree programs develop knowledge and skills that prepare them for analyzing what information resource is about and representing this aboutness with a combination of free-text keywords/keyphrases and terms from controlled vocabularies that are widely used by practitioners in the field. This paper reports the results of the evaluation of professional competencies developed by future information professionals in the representation of an information resource’s aboutness in a real-life practical setting. The dataset used in this evaluation consists of over 18 thousand metadata records -- created over 12 years, mostly by students -- in the major digital collection that provides access to historical patents
References
Aljalahmah, S.H., & Zavalina, O. L. (2023). Dublin Core metadata created by Kuwaiti students: Exploration of quality in context. In, Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity: 18th International Conference, iConference 2023, Proceedings (pp. 544–551). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_41
Bates, M. (2002). After the dot-bomb: Getting web information retrieval right this time. First Monday, 7(7). Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/971/892
Beall, J., & Kafadar, K. (2004). The effectiveness of copy cataloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48 (2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.48n2.92-101
Bruce, T. R., & Hillmann, D. I. (2004). The continuum of metadata quality: Defining, expressing, exploiting. In D. Hillman & L. Westbrook (Eds.), Metadata in practice (pp. 238–256). Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247818823_The_Continuum_of_Metadata_Quality_Defining_Expressing_Exploiting
Cochrane, P. (1979). Universal Subject Access (USA): Can anyone do it? In Redesign of Catalogs and Indexes for Improved Online Subject Access: Selected papers of Pauline A. Cochrane, Phoenix, Ariz.: Oryx Press, 1985, pp. 223–238.
Fairthorne, R.A. (1969). Content analysis, specification and control. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 4, 73–109.
Golub, K. (2014). Subject Access to Information: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Libraries Unlimited.
Hjørland, B. (1997). The concept of subject or subject matter and basic epistemological positions. In Information Seeking and Subject Representation: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Information Science. Westport CT: Greenwood Press, 55-103.
Taylor, A. G., & Joudrey, D. N. (2002). On teaching subject cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 34(12), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1300/j104v34n01_13
Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Zavalin, V.I., & Zavalina, O.L. (2023). Exploration of accuracy, completeness, and consistency in metadata for physical objects in museum collections. In, Information for a Better World: Normality, Virtuality, Physicality, Inclusivity: 18th International Conference, iConference 2023, Proceedings (pp. 83-90). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_7
Zavalina, O. L., & Burke, M. (2021). Assessing skill building in metadata instruction: Quality evaluation of Dublin Core metadata records created by graduate students. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62(4), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis.62-4-2020-0083
Zavalina, O.L., Phillips, M., & Tarver, H. (2017). Quality assurance and evaluation of change for patent metadata. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54 (1), 842-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2017.14505401180
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vyacheslav Zavalin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.