On the Importance of ‘Spaciousness’ in LIS

Meditations on the Pandemic, Place, and a Post-Eurocentric Future





Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, library as place, spaciousness, contemplative studies, vastu


More than two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, it is imperative that we consider how this context has affected the field of library and information science (LIS).  While the pandemic’s effects can seem endless, I focus specifically on the existential fear the pandemic has generated and its implications for our field.  I link this existential fear particularly with our ability to share physical space together.  To this end, we must reinvigorate concepts such as library as place.  This paper shows how a contemplative focus in our profession can help in this regard.  However, this contemplative focus needs to move beyond Eurocentrism to truly expand the narrative in our field.  As such, I show how vāstu and its focus on inner ‘spaciousness’ can highlight new approaches to not just repair the damage wrought by neoliberalism and the pandemic, but to also find new ways to thrive both individually and collectively.


Becker, E. (1997). The denial of death. Simon & Schuster.

Blanke, H.T. (1989). Librarianship and political values: neutrality or commitment? Library Journal 114(12), 39-43.

Buschman, J. (2017). The library in the life of the public: implications of a neoliberal age. Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 87(1), 55-70.

Gorichanaz, T. (2021). Sanctuary: an institutional vision for the digital age. Journal of Documentation, 77(1), 1-17.

Green, T. & Fazi, T. (2021, November 23). The left’s Covid failure. UnHerd


Habermas, J. (1964). The public sphere: An encyclopedia article. (S. Lennox & F. Lennox, Trans.). New German Critique, 3, 49-55.

Hollis, J. (2018). Living an examined life: wisdom for the second half of the journey. Sounds True.

Honma, T. (2005). Trippin’ over the color line: the invisibility of race in library and information studies. Interactions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 1(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nj0w1mp

Hudson, D.J. (2016). On dark continents and digital divides: Information inequality and the reproduction of racial otherness in library and information studies. Journal of Information Ethics, 25(1), 62-80.

Johnson, B., Kavanagh, P. & Mattson, K. (eds.) (2003). Steal This University: The Rise of the Corporate University and an Academic Labor Movement. Routledge.

Komjathy, L. (2018). Introducing contemplative studies. John Wiley & Sons.

Latham, K.F., Hartel, J., and Gorichanaz, T. (2020). Information and contemplation: a call for reflection and action. Journal of Documentation 76(5), 999-1017.

Leckie, G. (2004). Three perspectives on libraries as public spaces. Feliciter 50(6), 233-236.

Lee, C.M., Cadigan, J.M. & Rhew, I.C. (2020). Increases in loneliness among young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and association with increases in mental health problems. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(5), 714-717.

Levy, D.M. (2016). Mindful tech. Yale University Press.

Merton, T. (1966). Is the world a problem?: Ambiguities in the secular. Commonweal


Pyati, A.K. (2019). Public libraries as contemplative spaces: A framework for action and research. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association 68(4), 356-370.

Svoboda, R. (1992). Ayurveda: life, health, and longevity. Penguin.

Svoboda, R. (2013). Vastu: breathing life into space. Namarupa.

The Center for Contemplative Mind in Society. (n.d.). The tree of contemplative practices. http://www.contemplativemind.org/practices/tree

Trosow, S.E. (2014). The commodification of information and the public good: new challenges for a progressive librarianship. Progressive Librarian 43, 17-29.

Wiegand, W.A. (2016). Tunnel vision and blind spots reconsidered: Part of our lives (2015) as a test case. Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 85(4), 347-370.






Juried Papers