Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Block I Illinois Library Illinois Open Publishing Network

Forum

Vol. 12 (2024)

On the Uses of Decolonial History for Life

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21900/j.vivliofika.v12.1825
Published
2024-12-27

Abstract

This essay provides arguments in favor of decolonizing the field of Russian and East European Studies,
focusing on the eighteenth-century history of Ukrainian-Russian relations. It envisages two directions for
decolonization: overcoming the traditional narrative of Russian history and rethinking the basic categories
we use to tell the history of the Russian Empire. It argues that we should reconsider a one-sided view of
empire as an embodiment of the politics of difference and pay more attention to the early modern policies of acculturation and assimilation that took the form of russification in the Russian Empire. It also emphasizes the need to overcome reductionism, typical of traditional national history. The history of the Ukrainian-Russian encounter in the early modern period cannot be presented as a black-and-white narrative of Russian subjugation and repression and Ukrainian resistance. It was a more complex story that also included a dimension of cultural entanglement with strong mutual influences.

References

  1. Artem’eva T.V., and M.I. Mikeshin. Intellektual’naia kul’tura ėpokhi Prosveshcheniia v Rossii. Saint Petersburg: Politekhnika Servis, 2020.
  2. Beissinger, Marc. “Situating Empire.” Ab Imperio 6, no. 3 (2005): 89-95.
  3. Belmessous, Saliha. Assimilation and Empire: Uniformity in French and British Colonies, 1541-1954. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  4. Blitstein, Peter A. “Nation and Empire in Soviet History, 1917–1953.” Ab Imperio 7, no. 1 (2006): 197-219.
  5. Bojanowska, Edyta M. Nikolai Gogol: Between Ukrainian and Russian Nationalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
  6. Burbank, Jane, and Frederick Cooper. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  7. Griffin, Clare. “Studying War in a Time of War: Russian Imperialism in the Seventeenth and Twenty-First Centuries.” Russian History 50 (2023): 243-259.
  8. Finnin, Rory. Blood of Others: Stalin’s Crimean Atrocity and the Poetics of Solidarity.
  9. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press, 2022.
  10. Hamburg, G.M. Russia’s Path Toward Enlightenment: Faith, Politics, and Reason, 1500-1801. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.
  11. Hen-Konarski, Tomasz. “Beyond Empire: In Search of New Tools for the Description of the Austrian Monarchy.” Ukrainian Historical Review/Ukraïns’kyĭ istorychnyĭ ohliad no. 3 (2024): 15-63.
  12. Ilchuk, Yuliya. “From Russian Literature to Russian-Language Literature of the Empire.” Ab Imperio 23, no. 2 (2022): 85-89.
  13. Ivanov, Andrey V. A Spiritual Revolution: The Impact of Reformation and Enlightenment in Orthodox Russia. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2020.
  14. Johnson, Juliet. “Decentering Russia: Challenges and Opportunities.” ASEEES NewsNet 64, no. 1 (January 2024): 3-8.
  15. “Kolomak Articles.” Internet Encyclopedia of Ukraine. Accessed 05.11.2024 https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CK%5CO%5CKolomakArticles.htm.
  16. Miller, Alexei. The Romanov Empire and Nationalism. Budapest: CEU Press, 2008.
  17. Mogilner, Marina. “There Can Be No ‘Vne’.” Ab Imperio 22, no. 4 (2021): 24-26.
  18. Nietzsche, Friedrich. “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life.” In Friedrich Nietzsche, Untimely Meditations, edited by Daniel Breazeale and translated by R.G. Hollingdale, 57-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  19. Ohlmeyer, Jane. Making Empire: Ireland, Imperialism, and the Early Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
  20. Pavlov-Silvanskiĭ, Nikolaĭ. Proekty reform v zapiskakh sovremennikov Petra Velikago. Opyt izucheniia russkikh proektov i neizdannye ikh teksty. Saint Petersburg: Tipografiia V. Kirshbauma, 1897.
  21. Pratt, Mary Louise. “Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession no. 91 (1991): 33–40.
  22. Ryabchuk, Mykola. “The Toxic Spell of Imperial Knowledge.” Desk Russie. May 27, 2023. https://desk-russie.info/2023/05/27/the-toxic-spell-of-imperial-knowledge.html.
  23. Staliūnas, Darius. “Between Russification and Divide and Rule: Russian Nationality Policy in the Western Borderlands in mid-19th Century.” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 55, no. 3 (2007): 357-373.
  24. Thaden, Edward C. “Russification in Tsarist Russia.” In Interpreting History: Collective Essays on Russia’s Relations with Europe, edited by Edward C. Thaden and Marianna Forster Thaden, 211-220. New York, NY: Boulder, 1990.
  25. Schmid, Ulrich. “Contact Zone vs. Postcolonial Condition: On the Relevance of a Concept from Latin American Studies for Research on Ukraine.” In Cossacks in Jamaica, Ukraine at the Antipodes. Essays in Honor of Marko Pavlyshyn, edited by Alessandro Achilli, Serhy Yekelchyk, and Dmytro Yesypenko, 554-572. Boston, MA: Academic Studies Press, 2020.
  26. Schulze Wessel, Martin. “The Concept of Empire and German Sonderwege in the Historical Debate about Ukraine.” Ab Imperio 23, no. 1 (2022): 91-100.
  27. Smith-Peter, Susan, and Sean Pollock. “How the Field was Colonized: Russian History’s Ukrainian Blind Spot.” Russian History no. 50 (2023): 145–156.
  28. Vulpius, Ricarda. Die Geburt des Russländischen Imperiums. Herrschaftskonzepte und -praktiken im 18. Jahrhundert. Cologne-Weimar-Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2020.
  29. Weeks, Theodore. “Managing Empire: Tsarist Nationalities Policy.” In The Cambridge History of Russia vol. 2: Imperial Russia, 1689-1917, ed. by Dominic Lieven, 27-44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  30. Yakovenko, Natalia. “Ukraïns’ka kul’tura XVII st. iak poshuk ‘tret’oho shliakhu’.” In Shliakh u chotyry stolittia: materialy mizhnarodnoï naukovoï konferentsii “Ad fontes – Do dzherel” do 400-ї richnytsi zasnuvannia Kyivo-Mohylians’koï akademii, edited by Natalia Yakovenko, 12-23. Kyiv: NaUKMA, 2016.
  31. Zayarnyuk, Andriy. “Historians as Enablers? Historiography, Imperialism, and the Legitimization of Russian Aggression.” East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies 9, no. 2 (2022): 191-212.